Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Medical Physicsarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Medical Physics
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
Medical Physics
Article . 2021
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Eigencolor radiochromic film dosimetry

Authors: Hugo, Bouchard; Ilias, Billas; Anna, Subiel; Simon, Duane;

Eigencolor radiochromic film dosimetry

Abstract

PurposeThe goal of this work is to propose a new multichannel method correcting for systematic thickness disturbances and to evaluate its precision in relevant radiation dosimetry applications.MethodsThe eigencolor ratio technique is introduced and theoretically developed to provide a method correcting for thickness disturbances. The method is applied to EBT3 GafchromicTM film irradiated with cobalt‐60 and 6 MV photon beams and digitized with an Epson 10000XL photo scanner. Dose profiles and output factors of different field sizes are measured and analyzed. Variance analysis of the previous method of Bouchard et al. [“On the characterization and uncertainty analysis of radiochromic film dosimetry” Med Phys. 2009;36:1931‐1946] is adapted to the new approach. Uncertainties are predicted for relevant applications.ResultsResults show that systematic disturbances attributed to thickness variations are efficiently corrected. The method is shown efficient to identify and correct for dark spots which cause systematic errors in single‐channel distributions. Applications of the method in the context of relative dosimetry yields standard uncertainties ranging between 0.8% and 1.9%, depending on the region of interest (ROI) size and the film irradiation. Variance analysis predicts that uncertainty levels between 0.3% and 0.6% are achievable with repeated measurements. Uncertainties are found to vary with absorbed dose and ROI size.ConclusionsThe proposed multichannel method is efficient for accurate dosimetry, reaching uncertainty levels comparable to previous publications with EBT film. The method is also promising for applications beyond clinical QA, such as machine characterization and other advanced dosimetry applications.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Film Dosimetry, Calibration, Uncertainty, Radiation Dosage

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!