
pmid: 31063260
AbstractLinear quantitative structure‐property relationships (QSPRs) for the prediction of diffusion coefficients (log Dp) were developed for organic contaminants in two common passive sampler materials, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and low‐density polyethylene (LDPE). Literature data was compiled for both PDMS and LDPE resulting in final data sets of 196 and 79 compounds, respectively. Data sets contained compounds with log Dp values that ranged over about 5 log units and 3 log units for PDMS and LDPE, respectively. The quality of log Dp prediction using either simple molecular descriptors or quantum‐chemical based COSMO‐RS sigma moment descriptors was compared for both materials. For PDMS, the sigma moment descriptor QSPR had the best predictivity with a correlation coefficient of R2=0.85 and root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.36 for log Dp. The molecular descriptor QSPR resulted in a correlation coefficient of R2=0.78 and RMSE of 0.45 for log Dp. For LDPE, the molecular descriptor QSPR had the best predictivity, with the final correlation coefficient of R2=0.86 and RMSE of 0.21 for log Dp. The sigma moment descriptor QSPR resulted in a correlation coefficient of R2=0.66 and RMSE of 0.33 for log Dp. The purely electronic structure‐based sigma moments are therefore shown to be a viable option for descriptors compared to the more commonly used molecular descriptors for organic contaminants in PDMS. The significance of the descriptors in each QSPR is discussed.
Diffusion, Models, Chemical, Polyethylene, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Quantum Theory, Dimethylpolysiloxanes
Diffusion, Models, Chemical, Polyethylene, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Quantum Theory, Dimethylpolysiloxanes
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
