
pmid: 16317939
AbstractThe functioning and survival of orthotopic liver allotransplants in toto were compared with heterotopic partial and whole allotransplants in inbred rats. In contrast to the rapid and aggressive rejection of the heterotopic allografts, the orthotopic whole‐liver allografts survived for prolonged periods. These latter grafts were subjected to mild cellular attack 11 to 12 days following transplantation, but they survived without the massive cellular infiltration and hepatocytolysis seen in the heterotopic partial grafts. Biliary secretion by the orthotopic whole‐liver allografts was functional throughout the survival period and was markedly increased during the final stages of survival, whereas the heterotopic liver grafts ceased to excrete normal bile by day 9, after which they were completely depigmented.
Male, Disease Models, Animal, Transplantation, Heterotopic, Rats, Inbred Lew, Rats, Inbred BN, Anastomosis, Surgical, Graft Survival, Animals, Transplantation, Homologous, Liver Transplantation, Rats
Male, Disease Models, Animal, Transplantation, Heterotopic, Rats, Inbred Lew, Rats, Inbred BN, Anastomosis, Surgical, Graft Survival, Animals, Transplantation, Homologous, Liver Transplantation, Rats
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
