
doi: 10.1002/micr.1049
pmid: 11746557
AbstractFunctional electrical stimulation (FES) neuroprostheses can be used to replace lost motor and sensory function in persons with neurological disorders. FES technology has subsequently been shown effective and safe in restoring hand function in adults with spinal cord injury. The freehand system consists of an implanted receiver‐stimulator, an external shoulder position sensor, and an external control unit. Commands are originated by voluntary movement of the contralateral shoulder and are measured by the sensor. There are several types of electrodes: epimysial, intramuscular, nerve cuff, and intraneural. Neuroprostheses are recommended within the context of all available reconstructive options for the upper limbs. Voluntary tendon transfers are the first choice. The clinical outcomes as measured by improvement on scales of impairment, activities of daily living, and satisfaction are rewarding. The next step in improvement of the motor function of person with spinal cord injury will be the addition of a controllable second upper extremity and the elimination of additional external hardware. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. MICROSURGERY 21:256‐263 2001
Male, Equipment Safety, Peripheral Nervous System Diseases, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Equipment Design, Prostheses and Implants, Recovery of Function, Severity of Illness Index, Electrodes, Implanted, Treatment Outcome, Arm, Animals, Humans, Female, Follow-Up Studies
Male, Equipment Safety, Peripheral Nervous System Diseases, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Equipment Design, Prostheses and Implants, Recovery of Function, Severity of Illness Index, Electrodes, Implanted, Treatment Outcome, Arm, Animals, Humans, Female, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
