
doi: 10.1002/met.1508
ABSTRACTThe reliability of ground‐based measurements is important in a variety of meteorological areas, such as weather forecasts, air quality and climate. In order to improve this reliability, closer co‐operation with the metrological community has been established. This paper looks at another possible route for improvements, based on carrying out a quality assessment of ground‐based measurements using advanced quality techniques. The quality function deployment (QFD) method was adapted so as to be able to analyse the results of a survey that was conducted among meteorological community. They were asked to analyse the key performance characteristics of typical automatic weather stations (AWSs) systematically with respect to the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) classifications and requirements. The QFD is a well‐known quality tool that connects customer expectations with technical functionalities or engineering characteristics. It makes it possible to prioritize the needs and quantify the results of the assessment. The answers from the survey's questionnaire were used as the input data for the QFD matrix. The findings reveal that the closest correlations are between the customer expectations or attributes and the engineering characteristics, e.g., the validation of the AWSs and the measurement methods, the regular calibration of sensors, and the implementation of automated and manual controls. From the second level of the QFD matrix, it was found that the most important technical solution serving the previously mentioned needs is related to having control over the development and upgrading of the AWSs' software and in terms of an automatic check and the transfer of data to the central database.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
