Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Movement Disordersarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Movement Disorders
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Non‐Motor Fluctuations in Parkinson's Disease: Validation of the Non‐Motor Fluctuation Assessment Questionnaire

Authors: Galit Kleiner; Hubert H. Fernandez; Kelvin L. Chou; Alfonso Fasano; Kevin R. Duque; Diana Hengartner; Albie Law; +7 Authors

Non‐Motor Fluctuations in Parkinson's Disease: Validation of the Non‐Motor Fluctuation Assessment Questionnaire

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackgroundIn patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), sleep, mood, cognitive, autonomic, and other non‐motor symptoms may fluctuate in a manner similar to motor symptoms.ObjectivesTo validate a final version of a patient‐rated questionnaire that captures the presence and severity of non‐motor fluctuations in levodopa‐treated PD patients (NoMoFA).MethodsWe recruited PD subjects from five movement disorders centers across the US and Canada. We assessed the internal consistency, floor and ceiling effects, test–retest reliability, and concurrent validity of NoMoFA. Classical test theory and item response theory methods informed item reduction and Delphi process yielded a final questionnaire.ResultsTwo hundred subjects and their care‐partners participated in the study (age: 66.4 ± 9.6 years; disease duration: 9 ± 5.5 years; median Hoehn and Yahr [H&Y] OFF: 3 [range 1−5]; mean Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) III ON score: 27.4 ± 14.9). Acceptability of the scale was adequate. There were floor effects in 8/28 items. Cronbach's alpha was 0.894. While eight items had “item‐to‐total” correlations below the cutoff of 0.4, removing these items did not improve Cronbach's alpha. Test–retest reliability was acceptable (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.64−0.80). Concurrent validity was adequate with all Spearman's rho values comparing NoMoFA score to other measures of parkinsonian severity showing significance and in the expected direction. A final Delphi panel eliminated one item to avoid redundancy.ConclusionsThe final 27‐item self‐administered NoMoFA is a valid and reliable questionnaire, capturing both static and fluctuating non‐motor symptoms in PD. © 2021 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

Country
United States
Keywords

validation, non- motor fluctuations, Canada, non- motor symptoms, questionnaire, Reproducibility of Results, Parkinson Disease, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Surveys and Questionnaires, Health Sciences, Parkinson’s disease, Humans, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    39
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
39
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!