
AbstractTo investigate over time changes in striatal dopamine transporter (DAT), we performed two sequential N‐ω‐fluoropropyl‐2β‐carbomethoxy‐3β‐(4‐iodophenyl) tropane single photon computed tomography (SPECT) scans in 20 subjects with essential tremor (ET), in 13 with Parkinson disease (PD) and in 23 healthy controls (HC, one scan only). We also performed an [99mTc]ethyl cysteinate dimer bicisate SPECT exam for regional brain network analysis in 9 ET, in a second group of 18 PD (9 with tremor, tPD and 9 akinetic‐rigid dominant, arPD) and in 8 HC. PD subjects had a reduced DAT binding in comparison to ET and HC with an annual decline rate of 7.3% in the contralateral putamen. There were no mean uptake differences between ET and HC at baseline and no uptake loss over time in ET. A discriminant analysis grouped 30% (first scan) and 5% (second scan) of ET as PD and a partition analysis showed overlap between ET and PD for caudate nucleus uptake. Spatial covariance analysis revealed that the expression of the PD‐related regional pattern separated both tPD and arPD from ET and HC. In conclusion, PD and ET do not share a common pattern of dopaminergic loss over time. However, mild impairment of dopamine transporter in the caudate nucleus may contribute to tremor onset in ET. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society
Aged, 80 and over, Male, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon, Essential Tremor, Brain, Discriminant Analysis, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Iodine Isotopes, Neural Pathways, Humans, Female, Aged, Tropanes
Aged, 80 and over, Male, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon, Essential Tremor, Brain, Discriminant Analysis, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Iodine Isotopes, Neural Pathways, Humans, Female, Aged, Tropanes
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 80 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
