
doi: 10.1002/mds.22744
pmid: 19672994
AbstractSpiral analysis is a computerized method of analyzing upper limb motor physiology through the quantification of spiral drawing. The objective of this study was to determine whether spirals drawn by patients with Niemann‐Pick disease type C (NPC) could be distinguished from those of controls, and to physiologically characterize movement abnormalities in NPC. Spiral data consisting of position, pressure, and time were collected from 14 NPC patients and 14 age‐matched controls, and were analyzed by the Mann‐Whitney U test. NPC spirals were characterized by: lower speed (2.67 vs. 9.56 cm/s, P < 0.001) and acceleration (0.10 vs. 2.04 cm/s2, P < 0.001), higher loop width variability (0.88 vs. 0.28, P < 0.001), tremor (5/10 vs. 0/10 trials in the dominant hand, P < 0.001), and poor overall spiral rating (2.53 vs. 0.70, P < 0.005). NPC spirals also exhibited sustained drawing pressure profiles that were abnormally invariant with time. Other features, such as the tightness of loop widths, were normal. Our findings reveal that differing aspects of tremor, Parkinsonism, ataxia, and dystonia are quantifiable in NPC patients. © 2009 Movement Disorder Society
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Electromyography, Movement, Niemann-Pick, Niemann-Pick Disease, Type C, Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted, Statistics, Nonparametric, Upper Extremity, Young Adult, Spiral analysis, Case-Control Studies, Humans, Female, Motor physiology
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Electromyography, Movement, Niemann-Pick, Niemann-Pick Disease, Type C, Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted, Statistics, Nonparametric, Upper Extremity, Young Adult, Spiral analysis, Case-Control Studies, Humans, Female, Motor physiology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 32 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
