
doi: 10.1002/mds.21409
pmid: 17357141
AbstractPurposeTo compare the Morisky medication adherence questionnaire to pill counts as measures of adherence in the NET‐PD futility clinical trials. Background: Like in other chronic diseases, non‐adherence with medications occurs in Parkinson's disease (PD), although nonadherence has not been of significant concern in most PD clinical trials. The most common approach to assessment is to do a pill count at each visit. The simple, 4‐question Morisky medication adherence questionnaire may provide an alternative approach to monitoring treatment adherence in PD.MethodsAdherence data from two NET‐PD Phase II clinical trials enrolling a total of 413 participants were analyzed. The association between demographic and clinical characteristics and adherence was explored.ResultsNinety‐percent of participants took 80% or more of the study drug. However, the Morisky medication adherence questionnaires showed 56% report high and 44% report medium adherence. Agreement between the two measures is fair (ICC = 0.40).ConclusionsOverall adherence as assessed by pill count appears high. The Morisky medication adherence questionnaire may be useful in PD clinical trials, since it is moderately correlated to pill count and may be more sensitive to nonadherence. © 2007 Movement Disorder Society
Antiparkinson Agents, Predictive Value of Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Patient Compliance, Reproducibility of Results, Parkinson Disease, Middle Aged
Antiparkinson Agents, Predictive Value of Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Patient Compliance, Reproducibility of Results, Parkinson Disease, Middle Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 48 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
