
doi: 10.1002/mde.3115
This paper uses a repeated‐game model to study the retention of talented workers in the face of competition for talent. When the job benefits that workers value are non‐contractible, retention cannot be achieved by a sequence of spot contracts, but must be based on self‐enforcing long‐term agreements, which we call relational retention contracts. Retention then is successful only if workers trust their employers' promises. We demonstrate that relational contracts are valuable even if there are no incentive problems inside firms and that firms with a relatively low valuation for talent may be able to retain talented workers.
CONTRACTS, EARNINGS, ECONOMICS, PRODUCTIVITY, MARKET, SEARCH, AGENCY, MANAGEMENT
CONTRACTS, EARNINGS, ECONOMICS, PRODUCTIVITY, MARKET, SEARCH, AGENCY, MANAGEMENT
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
