
AbstractIn the last 20 years many multi‐objective linear programming (MOLP) methods with continuous variables have been developed. However, in many real‐world applications discrete variables must be introduced. It is well known that MOLP problems with discrete variables can have special difficulties and so cannot be solved by simply combining discrete programming methods and multi‐objective programming methods.The present paper is intended to review the existing literature on multi‐objective combinatorial optimization (MOCO) problems. Various classical combinatorial problems are examined in a multi‐criteria framework. Some conclusions are drawn and directions for future research are suggested.
transportation, Research exposition (monographs, survey articles) pertaining to operations research and mathematical programming, Combinatorial optimization, network flow, multi-objective linear programming, travelling salesman, Programming involving graphs or networks, assignment, Discrete location and assignment, knapsack, allocation, Deterministic network models in operations research, survey, combinatorial optimization, Multi-objective and goal programming, transshipment
transportation, Research exposition (monographs, survey articles) pertaining to operations research and mathematical programming, Combinatorial optimization, network flow, multi-objective linear programming, travelling salesman, Programming involving graphs or networks, assignment, Discrete location and assignment, knapsack, allocation, Deterministic network models in operations research, survey, combinatorial optimization, Multi-objective and goal programming, transshipment
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 222 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
