
doi: 10.1002/mcda.328
AbstractFor people working in finance, either in academia or in practice or in both, the combination of ‘finance’ and ‘multiple criteria’ is not obvious. However, we believe that many of the tools developed in the field of MCDM can contribute both to the quality of the financial economic decision making process and to the quality of the resulting decisions. In this paper we answer the question why financial decision problems should be considered as multiple criteria decision problems and should be treated accordingly. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Management decision making, including multiple objectives, finance, Decision theory, decision analysis, decision making, finance, financial decisions, multiple criteria, financial decision making, MCDM, jel: jel:C44, jel: jel:G39, jel: jel:M, jel: jel:G3
Management decision making, including multiple objectives, finance, Decision theory, decision analysis, decision making, finance, financial decisions, multiple criteria, financial decision making, MCDM, jel: jel:C44, jel: jel:G39, jel: jel:M, jel: jel:G3
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 52 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
