
doi: 10.1002/lt.25311
pmid: 30021054
Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) is known as a risk factor of coronary artery disease, stroke, hyperphosphatemia, chronic inflammation, diabetes, and decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate. However, the clinical implications of incidental AAC findings in liver transplantation (LT) have not been evaluated in terms of posttransplantation survival and complications. Therefore, we analyzed the relationships between the AAC level and the outcomes following LT. A total of 156 consecutive patients who underwent LT between January 2007 and December 2014 were divided into 2 groups according to their AAC level (<100 mm3 or ≥100 mm3), as calculated using the Agatston method. Even after propensity matching, the survival time was significantly longer in the low‐AAC group compared with that in the high‐AAC group (median survival time, 4.5 versus 3.0 years; P < 0.01). A multivariate analysis identified high AAC level (hazard ratio, 2.2) and old donor age (hazard ratio, 2.2) as prognostic factors for overall survival. In conclusion, high AAC is an independent unfavorable prognostic factor in LT.
Adult, Male, Computed Tomography Angiography, Age Factors, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Survival Analysis, Tissue Donors, Transplant Recipients, Liver Transplantation, End Stage Liver Disease, Risk Factors, Preoperative Period, Humans, Female, Aorta, Abdominal, Vascular Calcification, Aged, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Male, Computed Tomography Angiography, Age Factors, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Survival Analysis, Tissue Donors, Transplant Recipients, Liver Transplantation, End Stage Liver Disease, Risk Factors, Preoperative Period, Humans, Female, Aorta, Abdominal, Vascular Calcification, Aged, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
