
doi: 10.1002/lsm.21042
pmid: 21290392
AbstractObjectivesNear‐infrared laser illumination (NILI), with or without photo‐activated (PA) agents, has bactericidal and wound healing promoting effects. NILI may have a potential role managing chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).MethodsA prospective randomized study with 23 symptomatic post‐surgical CRS patients with positive cultures was conducted. Two groups (GR1 and GR2) were treated with NILI. Objective nasal endoscopic scoring (NES) was elaborated. GR1 was treated with a 940 nm laser, while GR2 was treated with a topical PA agent, indocyanine‐green, followed with 810 nm laser. SNOT20 scores, NES, and cultures were obtained prior to illumination. Saccharin test was performed 1 week following treatment.ResultsSome cultures remained positive through treatment, with Staph. aureus predominating. Both therapy arms demonstrated clinical efficacy. The SNOT20 score change was 0.9, 0.8 for GR1 and GR2, respectively (P < 0.05). Improvement (P < 0.05) was observed based on NES. No significant difference was observed between two treatment groups. All passed the saccharin test. Therapeutic effect was sustained for a minimum of 2 months. Side effects were minimal.ConclusionsNILI was objectively and subjectively beneficial in managing CRS, safe, reproducible, sustained and appeared not to interfere with ciliary motility. CRS exacerbation was avoided without using antibiotics or steroids. Lasers Surg. Med. 43:187–191, 2011. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Indocyanine Green, Male, Photosensitizing Agents, Endoscopy, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, Photochemotherapy, Chronic Disease, Quality of Life, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Lasers, Semiconductor, Low-Level Light Therapy, Sinusitis, Rhinitis
Indocyanine Green, Male, Photosensitizing Agents, Endoscopy, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, Photochemotherapy, Chronic Disease, Quality of Life, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Lasers, Semiconductor, Low-Level Light Therapy, Sinusitis, Rhinitis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 26 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
