
doi: 10.1002/lsm.10075
pmid: 12210596
AbstractBackground and ObjectivesTattoo removal is a significant problem. The extraction of magnetite (Fe3O4) ink tattoos by a magnetic field was investigated, with and without Q‐switched laser treatment.Study Design/Materials and MethodsMagnetite particles (1.4 μm) were used to make mature, black skin tattoos on hairless albino rats. A Q‐switched ruby laser (QSRL) 3.5 J/cm2, 6.5‐mm spot size, 40‐nanosecond pulse width was used for treatment. Permanent magnets (1.4 T, 6‐mm diameter) were tested to extract the magnetite particles, alone and after QSRL. Lightening of treated tattoos was measured from digital photographs, and the amount and distribution of magnetite in skin biopsies was scored blindly.ResultsExternal application of magnets on mature magnetite tattoos without prior QSRL treatment, did not significantly extract, lighten, darken, or change their histologic appearance. A magnetic field applied immediately after QSRL treatment extracted some ink when epidermal injury was present, and caused significant redistribution of magnetite into the upper dermis with vertical banding along magnetic field lines. When applied for 3 weeks following QSRL, magnets caused darkening of tattoos.ConclusionsMagnetite skin tattoos can be manipulated by external magnets, especially after Q‐switched laser treatment. Magnetically‐extractable tattoos may be feasible. Lasers Surg. Med. 31:121–128, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Time Factors, Tattooing, Albinism, Iron, Contrast Media, Oxides, Ferrosoferric Oxide, Rats, Disease Models, Animal, Magnetics, Animals, Laser Therapy, Follow-Up Studies, Skin
Time Factors, Tattooing, Albinism, Iron, Contrast Media, Oxides, Ferrosoferric Oxide, Rats, Disease Models, Animal, Magnetics, Animals, Laser Therapy, Follow-Up Studies, Skin
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
