
AbstractIntroductionOtoscopes and otomicroscopes are the most commonly used instruments for visualizing the ear. Digital otoscopy (DO) could be used to improve diagnostics in primary health care by utilizing image enlargement. The aim of the study was to explore the possibilities of DO in remote consultations.Materials and MethodsBased on real‐life referrals, 45 otologic outpatients were recruited. DO was performed followed by an attending otologist's appointment, serving as the gold standard. Twenty‐four patient cases were analyzed on a digital platform as remote consultation cases containing the given referral information supplemented with DO videos (DOVs). A total of 71 evaluations were performed by five otologists. The quality of the DOVs, their suitability for remote consultations, the accuracy of diagnoses and the usefulness of remote consultations were determined.ResultsThe average DOV quality was judged to be 7.4 ± 0.3 (mean ± standard error of the mean; scale of 1–10). The diagnosis was correct in 79% of the cases. In 59% of the patients, the otologists considered that remote consultation could have replaced an in‐person visit.ConclusionsIn our simulated remote consultation setup, DOV quality was sufficient for diagnostic purposes, DO improved diagnostics and treatment planning in most cases and could be used to reduce the need for in‐person visits. DO‐aided remote consultation may improve diagnostics and access to care.Level of evidence: 3.
digital otoscope, RD1-811, Otorhinolaryngology, ophthalmology, otology, Otorhinolaryngology, RF1-547, digital otoscopy, Surgery, remote consultation, telemedicine, Original Research
digital otoscope, RD1-811, Otorhinolaryngology, ophthalmology, otology, Otorhinolaryngology, RF1-547, digital otoscopy, Surgery, remote consultation, telemedicine, Original Research
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
