
doi: 10.1002/lary.29995
pmid: 34978078
Objectives/HypothesisTo evaluate the ability of the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire‐7 (ETDQ‐7) to discriminate between patients with Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) and Non‐ETD diagnoses, and identify symptom information to improve ability to discriminate these groups.Study DesignCohort study.MethodsPilot retrospective study with consecutive adult patients presenting to otology clinics and one general otolaryngology clinic in an academic health system. Patients were administered ETDQ‐7 with eight additional symptom items. Electronic health records were reviewed for demographic and diagnostic information. Patients were grouped into diagnosis categories: 1) True ETD, 2) experiencing ear fullness (EF) not due to ETD, and 3) Control patients without ETD‐related disorders or EF. ETDQ‐7 and symptom item scores were compared by the diagnosis group. Receiver‐operative characteristics curves and area under the curve (AUC) were generated for each ETD diagnosis group based on ETDQ‐7 and symptom scores.ResultsOf the 108 patients included in this study 74 (68.5%) were diagnosed with ETD. Patients with ETD had higher (indicating worse symptom burden) overall ETDQ‐7 scores than Control group (Median [Q1, Q3] 3.0, [1.7, 4.1]; versus 1.5 [1.0, 3.4] P = .008). There was no statistically significant difference between overall ETDQ‐7 scores for ETD and Non‐ETD EF patients (P = .389). The AUC for the ETDQ‐7 in discriminating ETD from other conditions that cause EF was 0.569; the addition of 8 symptom questions to the ETDQ‐7 improved AUC to 0.801.ConclusionAdditional patient‐reported symptom information may improve the ability to discriminate ETD from other similarly presenting diagnoses when using ETDQ‐7.Level of Evidence3 Laryngoscope, 132:2217–2223, 2022
Adult, Cohort Studies, Eustachian Tube, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Prospective Studies, Ear Diseases, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Cohort Studies, Eustachian Tube, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Prospective Studies, Ear Diseases, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
