Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao The Laryngoscopearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
The Laryngoscope
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
The Laryngoscope
Article . 2022
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Dupilumab Adverse Events in Nasal Polyp Treatment: Analysis of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System

Authors: Austin R. Swisher; Rijul S. Kshirsagar; Nithin D. Adappa; Jonathan Liang;

Dupilumab Adverse Events in Nasal Polyp Treatment: Analysis of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System

Abstract

ObjectivesDupilumab was the first biologic approved to treat chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). While the risk of adverse events in phase‐III clinical trials was low, dupilumab‐associated adverse reactions (DAR) with real‐world use is unknown and potentially under‐reported. We aimed to evaluate DAR for CRSwNP treatment (CRSwNP‐tx) using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).Study DesignRetrospective database study.MethodsFAERS was queried for DAR from 2019Q1 to 2021Q2. Individual DAR (iDAR) were categorized and quantitatively compared between treatment groups (CRSwNP, asthma, atopic dermatitis). Zero‐truncated Poisson regression was modeled to predict the number of iDAR, and logistic regression was modeled to predict serious DARs.ResultsThere were 15,411 DAR observations; 911 for CRSwNP‐tx, of which 121 (13.3%) had serious reactions and 3 died. Common CRSwNP‐tx iDAR were dermatologic (13.9%), generalized (13.3%), and injection‐site (10.8%) symptoms. The number of CRSwNP‐tx iDAR was 2.99 [2.81, 3.17], compared to 3.44 [3.32, 3.56] for asthma and 3.18 [3.13, 3.24] for atopic dermatitis (Kruskal‐Wallis test, P < .001). For CRSwNP‐tx, iDAR reported‐risk‐ratio was 0.84 [0.77, 0.92] among men and 1.12 [1.04, 1.22] among older adults (>50). Serious DAR reported‐odds‐ratio was 1.37 [0.91, 2.04] among men and 1.39 [0.93, 2.08] among older adults.ConclusionsWhile there are limitations with FAERS, this analysis suggests CRSwNP‐tx is associated with fewer iDAR compared with other treatment indications. More iDAR are experienced among women and older adults, but men tend to have more serious DAR.Level of Evidence3 Laryngoscope, 132:2307–2313, 2022

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Asthma, Dermatitis, Atopic, Nasal Polyps, Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic, Chronic Disease, Humans, Female, Sinusitis, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    22
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
22
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!