
doi: 10.1002/lary.29914
pmid: 34687469
Objectives/HypothesisCurrent methods of assessing rib cartilage dimensions for laryngotracheal reconstruction (LTR) are inexact, making surgical planning difficult. The purpose of this study was to determine the most appropriate rib for costal cartilage graft LTR to minimize the number of ribs harvested and improve surgical outcomes.Study DesignRetrospective review.MethodsComputed tomography imaging of chest scans in 25 children aged 1 to 18 years was evaluated. The lengths and widths of medial and lateral cartilaginous segments of ribs 4 to 7 were measured bilaterally. Right and left cartilaginous rib dimensions were compared using a two‐sample t‐test. Linear mixed‐effect regression was performed to develop models quantifying the relationship between rib size and patient height, rib side, and rib number.ResultsRegression analysis established strong models for medial rib length (R2 = 0.89) and for medial and lateral rib width (R2 = 0.71, 0.77, respectively). There was no difference in rib dimensions across chest sides. Rib length and width increased with child height. Total cartilaginous rib length increased from superiorly to inferiorly, primarily due to an increase in the dimensions of the medial portion of each rib.ConclusionCartilaginous rib lengths and widths were associated with patient height, with taller children having longer ribs. Inferior ribs were longer than superior ribs, suggesting that inferior ribs may be preferred for LTR. There was no difference in cartilaginous rib length across chest side. Results may help surgeons with preoperative planning.Level of EvidenceNA Laryngoscope, 132:1682–1686, 2022
Costal Cartilage, Cartilage, Humans, Ribs, Child, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Retrospective Studies
Costal Cartilage, Cartilage, Humans, Ribs, Child, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
