Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ YUHSpace (Yonsei Uni...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
The Laryngoscope
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
The Laryngoscope
Article . 2021
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Double‐Blind Placebo‐Controlled Trial of Bepotastine Salicylate in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis

Authors: Ji‐Hun Mo; Jin Hyeok Jeong; Tae Hoon Kim; Seon‐Tae Kim; Soo Whan Kim; Kun Hee Lee; Seung‐No Hong; +6 Authors

Double‐Blind Placebo‐Controlled Trial of Bepotastine Salicylate in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis

Abstract

Objectives/HypothesisTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of a slow‐release form of bepotastine salicylate (HL151, Belion CR) in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR).Study DesignDouble‐blind, placebo‐controlled multicenter comparative study.MethodsTwo hundred seventy‐two PAR patients (aged 19–65 years) were studied to determine the efficacy and safety of HL151 (20 mg once daily administration) relative to those of a placebo in terms of improvements in total and nasal symptom scores. The subjects were randomized to the placebo (n = 138) or HL151 group (n = 134, 20 mg orally once daily for 4 weeks), and reflective and instantaneous total nasal symptom scores (TNSS) were measured daily in comparison with baseline. Among 272 subjects, 229 subjects (119 in the placebo group, 110 in the HL151 group) who completed the study were included for efficacy analysis.ResultsInstantaneous and reflective TNSS and nasal symptoms such as rhinorrhea, nasal itching, and sneezing at 2 and 4 weeks showed that HL151 was superior to the placebo (all P < .05). There were no significant differences in terms of adverse events and adverse drug reactions between the two groups. Regarding serious adverse events, there was only one case of acute hepatitis B, which was reported not to be associated with HL151.ConclusionsThis multicenter trial showed that once‐daily use of HL151 is efficacious and safe in adult patients with PAR and could improve compliance due to its convenience.Level of Evidence1b Laryngoscope, 131:E702–E709, 2021

Country
Korea (Republic of)
Related Organizations
Keywords

Oral, Adult, Male, Allergy, Pyridines, Piperidines / administration & dosage*, 610, Administration, Oral, Drug Administration Schedule, immunology, Young Adult, Double-Blind Method, Piperidines, 616, Humans, rhinology, Rhinitis, Aged, allergic rhinitis, adult rhinology, Allergic / drug therapy*, Middle Aged, Rhinitis, Allergic, Salicylates, Pyridines / administration & dosage*, Drug Combinations, Treatment Outcome, Delayed-Action Preparations, Administration, Female, Sino-Nasal Outcome Test, Salicylates / administration & dosage*

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Top 10%
Average
Average
Green