Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao The Laryngoscopearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
The Laryngoscope
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
The Laryngoscope
Article . 2021
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Effect of margin status and pathological grade in treatment of sinonasal mucoepidermoid carcinoma

Authors: Samuel R. Auger; Tirth Patel; Ashwin Ganti; Anish Raman; Aryan Shay; Hannah N. Kuhar; Edward C. Kuan; +3 Authors

Effect of margin status and pathological grade in treatment of sinonasal mucoepidermoid carcinoma

Abstract

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to investigate the association of demographic factors, grade, margin status, and treatment modalities for overall survival in patients with sinonasal mucoepidermoid carcinoma (SNMEC).Study DesignRetrospective database review.MethodsThe National Cancer Database was queried for patients of all ages with SNMEC between 2004 and 2015. Univariate Kaplan‐Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association of suspected prognostic factors with overall survival. Subgroup analysis by margin status and grade was performed.ResultsA total of 239 patients with SNMEC were included in the analysis. The 5‐year overall survival was 63.6%. Prognostic factors associated with decreased survival include age over 70 years (P = .027), sphenoid primary site (P = .002), and advanced‐stage malignancy (P = .024). Improved survival was associated with surgery achieving negative margins (P = .001). Adjuvant radiation was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.25, P = .015) in the negative‐margin group but was not found to be a statistically significant factor in the positive‐margin group (HR = 0.66, P = .509).ConclusionsThis investigation is the largest to date to analyze the association of treatment modalities with overall survival in SNMEC and subgroup analysis by histopathologic grade and surgical margin status of treatment outcomes. Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment in patients with SNMEC. However, administration of radiation may confer survival benefit to patients with negative margins.Level of Evidence4 Laryngoscope, 2020

Keywords

Male, Age Factors, Margins of Excision, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Survival Rate, Humans, Carcinoma, Mucoepidermoid, Female, Neoplasm Grading, Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms, Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!