
ObjectivesOptimal laryngeal exposure during transoral laryngeal surgery is fundamental. We aimed to evaluate the reliability of a recently proposed score (Laryngoscore) in predicting difficult laryngeal exposure (DLE) in an independent cohort of patients undergoing elective microlaryngoscopy. We also verified the relation between DLE, surgeon's expertise, and difficult intubation, and investigated possible areas for score improvement.Study DesignProspective validation study.MethodsA total of 136 patients were preoperatively evaluated using the Laryngoscore. Patients were divided into three classes according to patient position, type of laryngoscope, and need for external counterpressure to expose the anterior commissure. Based on their mean scores, two groups were identified: good laryngeal exposure (GLE) and DLE. A receiver operating characteristic curve with the Youden index was used to calculate the optimal cutoff value. The χ2 and Fisher exact test were used to correlate GLE and DLE to the surgeon's expertise and difficult intubation. The intraoperative anatomical parameters underlying DLE were also recorded.ResultsThe optimal cutoff value for differentiating GLE and DLE was 4, which identified 80.6% of DLE cases. No statistically significant difference in GLE and DLE distribution was found between surgeons (P = 0.43). The correlation between difficult intubation and DLE was statistically significant (P = 0.03). The intraoperative parameters determining DLE were epiglottis characteristics (floppy, tight, or short), bulky abdomen and chest, bulky tongue base, mobile teeth, and a narrow laryngeal aditus.ConclusionThe Laryngoscore is reliable for detecting DLE preoperatively. The inclusion of additional parameters may allow a more complete assessment and maximize its diagnostic accuracy.Level of Evidence2bLaryngoscope, 129:1438–1443, 2019
Adult, Male, Microsurgery, Laryngoscore; difficult laryngeal exposure; microlaryngoscopy; transoral laser microsurgery, laryngoscopy, Laryngeal Diseases, microlaryngoscopy, Predictive Value of Tests, Reference Values, Intubation, Intratracheal, Humans, Prospective Studies, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, difficult laryngeal exposure, Chi-Square Distribution, Laryngoscopy, Equipment Design, Middle Aged, transoral laser microsurgery, laryngoscopy, ROC Curve, Elective Surgical Procedures, Laryngoscore, Preoperative Period, Female, Larynx, difficult laryngeal exposure; Laryngoscore; microlaryngoscopy; transoral laser microsurgery, laryngoscopy
Adult, Male, Microsurgery, Laryngoscore; difficult laryngeal exposure; microlaryngoscopy; transoral laser microsurgery, laryngoscopy, Laryngeal Diseases, microlaryngoscopy, Predictive Value of Tests, Reference Values, Intubation, Intratracheal, Humans, Prospective Studies, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, difficult laryngeal exposure, Chi-Square Distribution, Laryngoscopy, Equipment Design, Middle Aged, transoral laser microsurgery, laryngoscopy, ROC Curve, Elective Surgical Procedures, Laryngoscore, Preoperative Period, Female, Larynx, difficult laryngeal exposure; Laryngoscore; microlaryngoscopy; transoral laser microsurgery, laryngoscopy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
