
AbstractObjectives/Hypothesis:Ear, nose, and throat assessment may be frequently requested for children with allergic rhinitis (AR). Nasal endoscopy allows a thorough evaluation of the nose. The aim of the study was to investigate whether there are endoscopic signs predictive for AR diagnosis in a cohort of children with suspected AR.Study Design:Cohort of observational study.Methods:There were 176 children (99 males; mean age, 7.5 years) studied. Clinical visit, nasal endoscopy, and skin prick test were performed in all patients. Nasal endoscopic signs were pale turbinates, middle turbinate contact, and inferior turbinate contact. The AR diagnosis was made when nasal symptom history was concordant with sensitization.Results:AR was diagnosed in 141 children. Inferior and middle turbinate contact were reliable predictive factors for AR (odds ratio 5.38 and 3.42, respectively), whereas pale turbinates did not predict it.Conclusions:This study suggests that nasal endoscopy may reveal signs predictive for AR diagnosis in children.
Male, Analysis of Variance, Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial, Adolescent, Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal, Endoscopy, Turbinates, Sensitivity and Specificity, Severity of Illness Index, Cohort Studies, Nasal Mucosa, Logistic Models, Predictive Value of Tests, Child, Preschool, Confidence Intervals, Humans, Female, Nasal Cavity, Child, Skin Tests
Male, Analysis of Variance, Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial, Adolescent, Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal, Endoscopy, Turbinates, Sensitivity and Specificity, Severity of Illness Index, Cohort Studies, Nasal Mucosa, Logistic Models, Predictive Value of Tests, Child, Preschool, Confidence Intervals, Humans, Female, Nasal Cavity, Child, Skin Tests
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 25 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
