
This study was undertaken to determine the incidence of spontaneous nystagmus (SN) in normals and evaluate its significance in patients. There were 60 normal subjects and SN was recorded in 8 (13%). Between January 1979 and November 1981, SN without past pointing was the only detectable abnormality in 41 patients undergoing a vestibular evaluation. An intracranial lesion could be confirmed in 34 patients (83%). These results from both normal subjects and patients are compared with earlier reports in the literature. Because of differences in nomenclature and classification of SN and differences in technique of searching and recording SN, no true comparisons are possible. Our conclusion is that SN in normals should be regarded as an oculomotor abnormality for which there is no detectable cause. In patients SN is a valuable diagnostic sign and should be considered significant regardless of its slow phase velocity.
Adult, Male, Brain Diseases, Adolescent, Eye Movements, Electronystagmography, Fixation, Ocular, Middle Aged, Nystagmus, Pathologic, Humans, Female, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Aged
Adult, Male, Brain Diseases, Adolescent, Eye Movements, Electronystagmography, Fixation, Ocular, Middle Aged, Nystagmus, Pathologic, Humans, Female, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 25 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
