Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Knee Surgery Sports ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The addition of a lateral extra‐articular procedure to a primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with an increased rate of further surgery for cyclops lesions and restricted range of motion

Authors: Timothy Voskuijl; Kate E. Webster; Timothy S. Whitehead; Haydn J. Klemm; Lachlan M. Batty; Julian A. Feller;

The addition of a lateral extra‐articular procedure to a primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with an increased rate of further surgery for cyclops lesions and restricted range of motion

Abstract

AbstractPurposeThere has been a resurgence in the use of a lateral extra‐articular procedure (LEAP) in association with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction to reduce the risk of graft failure. The aim of this study was to examine whether the use of a LEAP in the setting of a primary ACL reconstruction was associated with an increased rate of reoperation for loss of range of motion or a symptomatic cyclops lesion.MethodsA consecutive cohort of patients aged less than 30 years who received a primary hamstring or quadriceps tendon autograft ACL reconstruction between January 2016 and December 2021 was retrospectively analysed. The usage of a modified Ellison LEAP in this cohort increased from 0% in 2016 to 51% in 2021. Reoperation rates for loss of motion or a symptomatic cyclops lesion during the first year after surgery, as well as knee extension deficits at 12 months, were compared between LEAP and no‐LEAP patients. Contingency analyses with risk ratio (RR) were calculated.ResultsA total of 1076 patients were included in this study [59.6% male, mean age 21.6 (SD 4.4) years, 84.9% hamstring tendon autografts]. In 17.3% (186/1076) of the patients the ACL reconstruction was augmented with a modified Ellison procedure. Of this group [67.2% male, mean age 18.8 (SD 3.7) years, 79.6% hamstring tendon autografts], 8.1% (confidence interval (CI) 4.2%–12%) required further surgery for restricted motion or a cyclops lesion in the first year after surgery, compared to 3.8% (CI 2.6%–5.1%) in the no‐LEAP group (risk ratio (RR) 2.1, p = 0.012). The difference in reoperation rates between those with and those without LEAP was more marked for patients who received a quadriceps tendon autograft (13.2% vs. 3.2%, RR 4.1, p = 0.019), compared to patients treated with a hamstring tendon autograft (6.8% vs. 3.9%, RR 1.8, p = 0.122). There was no significant difference in extension deficit at 12 months between patients with and those without a LEAP (mean 1.02 ± SD 2.6 degrees vs. mean 0.97 ± SD 2.4 degrees, p = 0.85).ConclusionSurgical intervention for a loss of range of motion or symptomatic cyclops lesion in the first postoperative year after primary ACL reconstruction was more common in patients who had an additional LEAP than in those who did not. The higher intervention rate was more apparent in patients who had a quadriceps tendon autograft ACL reconstruction.Level of EvidenceLevel III, retrospective comparative study.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!