
doi: 10.1002/jum.16484
pmid: 38795026
ObjectiveLevator avulsion is a major etiological factor of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and is primarily diagnosed on tomographic axial plane imaging. Two‐dimensional imaging can also image the levator. The objective was to test reproducibility and validity of coronal plane assessment for diagnosis of levator trauma by assessing the coronal plane obtained on tomographic ultrasound imaging.MethodsA retrospective study of women who had undergone an interview, POPQ and four‐dimensional translabial ultrasound at a tertiary urogynecological unit. Post‐processing of archived volume data was performed for assessment; and levator muscle area and estimate of remnant muscle mass in the coronal plane. Interobserver reproducibility of the latter two measures and associations between various measures of levator trauma and POP were tested.ResultsInterobserver agreement was good for percentage estimates (ICC 0.743), but fair for area measurements (ICC 0.482). Six hundred and twenty four women were seen, 468 (75%) had significant clinical prolapse. Full levator avulsions were diagnosed in 137 (22%). Mean TTS was 2.7 (range 0–12). On coronal plane assessment average muscle area was 1.47 (SD 0.76) cm2 and 1.55 (SD 0.74) cm2 on the right and left, respectively (P = .005). It was 76% and 79% for average estimates of muscle mass (P = .021). Both measures were strongly associated with POP; however, they were not superior to TTS in predicting POP.ConclusionCoronal plane assessment in volume data is reproducible and valid for evaluation of levator trauma. Muscle mass estimate may be a better measure than muscle area.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Observer Variation, Reproducibility of Results, Pelvic Floor, Middle Aged, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Humans, Female, Retrospective Studies, Ultrasonography, Aged
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Observer Variation, Reproducibility of Results, Pelvic Floor, Middle Aged, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Humans, Female, Retrospective Studies, Ultrasonography, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
