
doi: 10.1002/jso.27208
pmid: 36734844
AbstractBackgroundAfter patients have a surgical procedure for a gastrointestinal cancer, follow‐up is indicated. If cancer progression is documented in patients with mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinoma (MACA), a secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCRS) may be considered.MethodsIn patients who had a prior complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS), variables associated with the index CRS and SCRS were extracted. These variables were statistically assessed for their impact on survival.ResultsOf 198 MACA patients, 86 (43.4%) had SCRS. The median follow‐up was 5.0 years and the median survival was 7 years. Significant prognostic variables associated with the index CRS by univariant analysis was histopathologic grade of MACA‐Intermediate (MACA‐Int) as compared to other MACA histologic subtypes (p = 0.0164). Significant prognostic variables associated with the SCRS were bowel obstruction (p = 0.0149), interval of CRS to SCRS (p = 0.0059), and completeness of cytoreduction (p = 0.0014).ConclusionsIn the analysis of variables from SCRS, the interval from CRS to SCRS ≤24 months indicates an aggressive biology of the disease. The CC score of complete versus incomplete decreased median survival from 11 to 4 years. A composite of these two variables allowed prediction of survival of 50% when patients showed these two favorable variables and only 9.1% when these variables were unfavorable.
Survival Rate, Appendiceal Neoplasms, Humans, Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures, Hyperthermia, Induced, Combined Modality Therapy, Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous, Peritoneal Neoplasms, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate, Appendiceal Neoplasms, Humans, Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures, Hyperthermia, Induced, Combined Modality Therapy, Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous, Peritoneal Neoplasms, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
