
AbstractBackgroundAppendiceal cancer is a rare malignancy that exhibits a wide range of histology and treatment response. Given the rarity and heterogeneous nature of the disease, it has been difficult to define optimal treatment strategies. Our goal is to examine the association between use of systemic chemotherapy and survival in patients with metastatic low‐grade mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinoma.MethodsThe National Cancer Database (2004‐2015) was queried, and patients with mucinous, grade 1, stage IV appendiceal adenocarcinoma were identified. The Kaplan‐Meier method was used to calculate survival, and a Cox regression model was used to identify predictors of survival.ResultsSix hundred and thirty‐nine patients were identified. Five‐year overall survival (OS) for patients undergoing no chemotherapy vs chemotherapy was 52.9% and 61.3%, respectively. After adjusting with Cox proportional hazards model, chemotherapy was not associated with OS (HR:1.1, 95% CI:0.82‐1.40, P = 0.61). Patients who underwent surgical resection (HR:0.40, 95% CI:0.28‐0.57, P < .001) or were female (HR:0.61, 95% CI:0.5‐0.8, P < .001) had improved survival in adjusted analysis.ConclusionsThere is no association between undergoing chemotherapy and OS in this cohort of patients with stage IV low‐grade mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinoma. Development of national treatment guidelines is urgently needed for more consistency in the management of patients with appendiceal cancers.
Male, Databases, Factual, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Middle Aged, Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous, United States, Appendiceal Neoplasms, Humans, Female, Neoplasm Metastasis, Aged, Proportional Hazards Models
Male, Databases, Factual, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Middle Aged, Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous, United States, Appendiceal Neoplasms, Humans, Female, Neoplasm Metastasis, Aged, Proportional Hazards Models
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 35 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
