Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Surgical ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Surgical Oncology
Article . 2018 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Preoperative monocyte‐to‐lymphocyte ratio predicts recurrence in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Authors: Ferdinando Carlo Maria Cananzi; Eleonora Maddalena Minerva; Laura Samà; Laura Ruspi; Federico Sicoli; Lorenzo Conti; Uberto Fumagalli Romario; +1 Authors

Preoperative monocyte‐to‐lymphocyte ratio predicts recurrence in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Abstract

Background and ObjectivesSeveral inflammation markers were found to have a prognostic value in cancer. We investigated the significance of preoperative white cell ratios in determining gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) outcome.MethodsClinicopathological features of patients who underwent surgery for GIST were reviewed. The following peripheral blood inflammation markers were calculated: neutrophil‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte‐lymphocyte ratio (MLR), platelet‐lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil‐white blood cell ratio (NWR), lymphocyte‐white cell ratio (LWR), monocyte‐white cell ratio (MWR), and platelet‐white cell ratio (PWR).ResultsWe analyzed 127 patients. Three‐ and five‐year disease‐free survival (DFS) were 89.7% and 86.9%, respectively. The univariate analysis selected tumor diameter (P = 0.003), gastric location ( P = 0.024), cell type ( P = 0.024), mitosis ( P < 0.001), MLR ( P = 0.014), NLR ( P = 0.016), and PLR ( P = 0.001) as the factors associated to DFS. The independent prognostic factors for DFS were mitosis ( P = 0.001), NLR ( P = 0.015), MLR ( P = 0.015), and PLR ( P = 0.031), with MLR showing the highest statistical significance and hazard ratio (HR) value. MLR, NLR, and PLR were the only prognostic factors in the subgroup of patients with moderate to high Miettinen's risk class. A high value of MLR was associated with reduced DFS.ConclusionMLR, NLR, and PLR are independent prognostic factors for DFS in GISTs. We first demonstrated the role of MLR as a predictor of recurrence in GIST. Its inclusion into clinical management may improve the recurrence estimation.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Monocytes, Survival Rate, Young Adult, Preoperative Care, Humans, Female, Lymphocytes, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Gastrointestinal Neoplasms, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    52
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
52
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!