Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Surgical ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Surgical Oncology
Article . 2015 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Loss of ACSS2 expression predicts poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer

Authors: Hoon, Hur; Young-Bae, Kim; In-Hye, Ham; Dakeun, Lee;

Loss of ACSS2 expression predicts poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer

Abstract

BackgroundRecent studies have demonstrated that acetyl‐CoA synthetase 2 (ACSS2) plays a critical role in cancer cell survival; however, the role of ACSS2 in gastric carcinogenesis has not been determined.MethodsWe investigated the expression of ACSS2 in human gastric cancer (GC) tissues using immunohistochemistry, and analyzed its clinicopathological correlation and prognostic relevance.ResultsAmong 350 GCs, 219 cases (62.6%) were classified as ACSS2‐low, whereas 131 cases (37.4%) were ACSS2‐high. Loss of ACSS2 expression (ACSS2‐low) was more frequently observed in undifferentiated histology (P = 0.002), in cases with MLH1‐loss (P = 0.003), and in cases with SIRT3‐low (P < 0.001). The ACSS2‐low cases showed significantly lower mean disease‐free survival (DFS, 68.5 vs. 81.8 months; P = 0.025) and overall survival (OS, 73.5 vs. 86.6 months; P = 0.029). In multivariate analysis, loss of ACSS2 expression was identified as one of the independent prognostic factors predicting worse DFS (HR: 1.547, P = 0.018) and OS (HR: 1.476, P = 0.036).ConclusionsWe revealed that the loss of ACSS2 expression is a reliable independent poor prognostic factor in GC. Our results may expand our understanding of the involvement of glucose metabolism, including the role of ACSS2, in the pathogenesis of GC. J. Surg. Oncol. 2015;112:585–591. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Acetate-CoA Ligase, Adenocarcinoma, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous, Immunoenzyme Techniques, Survival Rate, Stomach Neoplasms, Tissue Array Analysis, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Female, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Carcinoma, Signet Ring Cell, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Neoplasm Staging

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    37
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
37
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!