
doi: 10.1002/jso.23217
pmid: 22806833
AbstractBackground and ObjectivesPatients with musculoskeletal tumors can face large bone deficiency, deformity, and nonunion. Distraction osteogenesis via the Ilizarov method may be useful for reconstruction of these deficiencies allowing limb preservation and optimizing function.MethodsWe reviewed 20 patients with a range of musculoskeletal tumors necessitating surgical treatment. The group included 9 females and 11 males with a mean age of 22.6 (8–58) years at a mean follow up of 81.7 (26–131) months. The mean bone deficiency was 7.9 (1.2–18.0) cm.ResultsThe mean lengthening achieved was 7.1 (3.5–18.0) cm over an EFI of 33.5 (range, 9.5–58.3) days/cm. This treatment resulted in 10 excellent and 3 good ASAMI bone scores, 10 excellent and 3 good ASAMI function scores, a mean lower extremity MSTS score of 93% and a mean upper extremity MSTS score of 87%. Treatment resulted in 2 complications, 18 obstacles, and 6 problems.ConclusionThe Ilizarov method is an effective technique for limb reconstruction of bone tumors, although extended time in external fixation is required. Since no one in this group received simultaneous chemotherapy or radiotherapy, we cannot comment on use of the Ilizarov method with these treatments. Further use and clinical follow‐up is warranted. J. Surg. Oncol. 2013;107:343–352. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Adult, Male, Leg, Adolescent, External Fixators, Osteogenesis, Distraction, Bone Neoplasms, Ilizarov Technique, Middle Aged, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Limb Salvage, Leg Length Inequality, Osteotomy, Arm, Humans, Female, New York City, Orthopedic Procedures, Bone Diseases, Child
Adult, Male, Leg, Adolescent, External Fixators, Osteogenesis, Distraction, Bone Neoplasms, Ilizarov Technique, Middle Aged, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Limb Salvage, Leg Length Inequality, Osteotomy, Arm, Humans, Female, New York City, Orthopedic Procedures, Bone Diseases, Child
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 46 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
