
doi: 10.1002/jso.23031
pmid: 22234931
AbstractBackgroundCurrently, the dictated operative report forms the cornerstone of documenting breast cancer surgery. Synoptic electronic reporting using a standardized template has been proposed for breast cancer operative notes to improve documentation. The goal of this study was to determine the current completeness of dictated operative reports for breast cancer surgery.MethodsAn iterative, consensus‐based approach to determining elements of a proposed synoptic surgical operative report identified critical elements. We then evaluated the dictated operative reports of 100 consecutive breast cancer patients for completeness of these elements.ResultsDetails regarding presentation and diagnosis were frequently incomplete (84%). Among patients undergoing mastectomy, the potential for breast conservation was partially described in only 60%. Only 41% had data regarding intra‐operative margin assessment during breast conservation surgery. In axillary lymph node dissections, 92% of patients had complete data about preservation of nerves, yet only 14% of reports contained complete information regarding sentinel lymph node biopsy. Closure was partially described in 91%.ConclusionsThe dictated operative report for breast cancer surgery does not adequately capture important data. A synoptic reporting system, which requires documentation of important elements, is a potentially beneficial tool in breast cancer surgery. J. Surg. Oncol. 2012; 106:79–83. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Adult, Canada, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, Mammaplasty, Breast Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Quality Improvement, Medical Records, Postoperative Complications, Humans, Lymph Node Excision, Female, Mastectomy, Aged, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Canada, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, Mammaplasty, Breast Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Quality Improvement, Medical Records, Postoperative Complications, Humans, Lymph Node Excision, Female, Mastectomy, Aged, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 51 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
