Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Surgical ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Surgical Oncology
Article . 2009 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Long‐term survivors of esophageal cancer: Disease‐specific quality of life, general health and complications

Authors: I, Gockel; U, Gönner; M, Domeyer; H, Lang; Th, Junginger;

Long‐term survivors of esophageal cancer: Disease‐specific quality of life, general health and complications

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionThe aim of our study was to assess the quality of life as well as secondary cancers/diseases and esophagectomy‐related or unrelated interventions in the long‐term course of surgery.Patients and MethodsOut of 417 patients who underwent esophageal resection for cancer between September 1985 and November 2003, 85 were defined as long‐term survivors (≥5 years). Fifty patients still alive in November 2008 complied with our inclusion criteria. The general (QLQ‐C 30, version 3.0) as well as the esophagus specific quality of life (QLQ‐OES 18) were analyzed with the help of the EORTC QLQ‐questionnaires.ResultsThe median observation interval since the operation was 100.1 (range 60–238) months. A median Global Health Status of quality of life (EORTC QLQ‐C 30) of 66.7 was found (range 16.7–100). Among the functioning scores, emotional (83.3 (range 16.7–100)) and cognitive functioning (83.3 (range 0–100)) were highest. The esophagus‐specific quality of life (EORTC QLQ‐OES 18) revealed a median value (scale 0–100) of 0 each for dysphagia and difficulties with swallowing saliva, whilst reflux was a major problem with a score of 50.0 (range 0–100).ConclusionOur results show that long‐term survival with a good quality of life is possible after curative esophagectomy for carcinoma. J. Surg. Oncol. 2010;102:516–522. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Esophageal Neoplasms, Health Status, Carcinoma, Middle Aged, Esophagectomy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Quality of Life, Humans, Female, Survivors, Aged, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    51
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
51
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!