
doi: 10.1002/jso.20538
pmid: 16724351
AbstractGallbladder cancer (GC) is considered a rare disease associated with a poor prognosis. Unfortunately, the low number of cases makes the performance of trials addressing the role of adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and/or palliative therapy difficult. For a long time, the majority of trials were 5‐fluorouracil (5 FU)‐based, and results were uniformly poor. Since the introduction of Gemcitabine, response rates of approximately 30% have been observed through the use of this drug and new approaches have been tested. In this sense, drugs such as Cisplatin and Capecitabine have been employed concurrently with gemcitabine and/or radiation. Since a recurrence pattern is both distant and local, chernoradiation seems a logical option to deal with the disease. However, at the present time, the lack of valid and scientific evidence means that most of the recommendations originate from trials dealing with other tumors, such as pancreas cancer and biliary tract cancer (BTC). The aforementioned treatment alternatives warrant further evaluation focusing on GC. J. Surg. Oncol. 2006;93:699–704. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
POTENTIALLY RESECTABLE TUMORS, Male, Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic, Palliative Care, Combined Modality Therapy, Deoxycytidine, Survival Analysis, Gemcitabine, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Biliary Tract Neoplasms, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Humans, Female, Gallbladder Neoplasms, Fluorouracil, Cisplatin, Capecitabine
POTENTIALLY RESECTABLE TUMORS, Male, Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic, Palliative Care, Combined Modality Therapy, Deoxycytidine, Survival Analysis, Gemcitabine, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Biliary Tract Neoplasms, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Humans, Female, Gallbladder Neoplasms, Fluorouracil, Cisplatin, Capecitabine
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 43 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
