
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>doi: 10.1002/jso.20485
pmid: 17061281
AbstractThe current recommendation for surgical treatment of tumors of the lower extremity is a limb‐sparing resection. Limb‐sparing resection coupled with complex reconstructive techniques and complemented by new chemotherapeutic agents and adjuvant radiation therapy has allowed us to achieve survival rates that are comparable to those of amputation with a better functional outcome. Recent advances in microsurgical techniques and the associated technologies and a better understanding of microvascular anatomy has allowed us to customize flaps to the specific needs of the patients and to achieve a lower donor site morbidity. Increased communication between the specialties of the multidisciplinary treatment team has also improved outcomes. The reconstructive component has become an integral part of the multidisciplinary care for patients with lower extremity tumors. It not only allows them to rapidly resume adjuvant therapies but also enables them to more easily resume their activities of daily living. J. Surg. Oncol. 2006;94:479–489. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Adult, Male, Postoperative Care, Microsurgery, Osteosarcoma, Foot, Brachytherapy, Bone Neoplasms, Soft Tissue Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Limb Salvage, Combined Modality Therapy, Amputation, Surgical, Surgical Flaps, Lower Extremity, Thigh, Humans, Female, Ankle
Adult, Male, Postoperative Care, Microsurgery, Osteosarcoma, Foot, Brachytherapy, Bone Neoplasms, Soft Tissue Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Limb Salvage, Combined Modality Therapy, Amputation, Surgical, Surgical Flaps, Lower Extremity, Thigh, Humans, Female, Ankle
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).  | 90 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.  | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).  | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.  | Top 10% | 
