
doi: 10.1002/jsfa.70490
pmid: 41622696
Abstract BACKGROUND Effective hybrid breeding in maize depends on accurate heterotic group classification and reliable prediction of heterosis. However, the reliability of different prediction methods and the factors influencing their performance remain unclear. RESULTS This study assessed heterotic group classification methods and heterosis prediction models using 102 crosses derived from three testers and 34 recombinant inbred lines (RILs). Among the methods classified, the heterotic group‐specific and general combining ability (HSGCA) approach was the most effective for heterotic group classification. The Tropical group contained a higher number of molecular markers in key genomic regions, whereas crosses involving the Tropical × Reid pattern showed a greater proportion of heterozygous markers. Both the Tropical × Reid and Tropical × Non‐Reid heterotic patterns exhibited higher genetic distance (GD). Genetic distance showed the strongest correlation with grain yield heterosis among all molecular measures evaluated. After the heterotic group classification, inter‐group GD correlated more strongly with heterosis than intra‐group GD. The GD within the Tropical × Reid inter‐group pattern showed the highest positive correlation with heterosis. CONCLUSIONS For grain yield heterosis in maize, it is concluded that: (1) HSGCA is the most suitable method for heterotic group classification; (2) GD is a robust molecular predictor of heterosis; and (3) the predictive power of GD is maximized within the Tropical × Reid inter‐group heterotic pattern, which offers a clear framework for future breeding programs. © 2026 Society of Chemical Industry.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
