
doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6300
pmid: 23847043
AbstractBACKGROUNDPomegranate juice has gained a high reputation for its health properties and consequently is now a highly demanded product. However, owing to the limited production and high price of fresh pomegranates, adulteration of pomegranate juice seems to be happening. Hence it is imperative to establish criteria for detecting adulteration.RESULTSAddition of grape juice significantly increased the contents of Ca, Mg and Fe and especially tartaric acid and proline and simultaneously decreased the content of K. Addition of peach juice up to 10% (v/v) only resulted in a significant increase in sucrose content. Regarding the volatile composition, adulteration of pomegranate juice with grape juice resulted in significant increases in acetic acid, isoamyl butyrate and especially 1‐hexanol and linalool, while adulteration with peach juice resulted in significant increases in butyl acetate, isobutyl butyrate, benzyl acetate and especially isoamyl butyrate.CONCLUSIONThe control protocols used in this study can serve as a basis for identification of pomegranate juice adulteration. It is important to highlight that it is necessary to simultaneously analyze and have results from several parameters to conclude that a particular pomegranate juice has been adulterated by mixing with another fruit juice. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry
Lythraceae, Volatile Organic Compounds, Proline, Acyclic Monoterpenes, Potassium, Dietary, Food Contamination, Food Inspection, Beverages, Lactones, Pentanols, Dietary Sucrose, Food Labeling, Spain, Fruit, Food Quality, Monoterpenes, Vitis, Prunus, Tartrates
Lythraceae, Volatile Organic Compounds, Proline, Acyclic Monoterpenes, Potassium, Dietary, Food Contamination, Food Inspection, Beverages, Lactones, Pentanols, Dietary Sucrose, Food Labeling, Spain, Fruit, Food Quality, Monoterpenes, Vitis, Prunus, Tartrates
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 43 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
