
doi: 10.1002/jsfa.3888
pmid: 20355116
AbstractBACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to develop a low‐fat (LF) mayonnaise containing polysaccharide gums as functional ingredients. Xanthan gum (XG, 15 g kg−1), citrus fiber (CF, 100 g kg−1) and variable concentration of guar gum (GG) were used to formulate the optimum ratios of polysaccharide gums as fat replacers. The fat content in LF mayonnaise was reduced to 50% if compared with full‐fat (FF) mayonnaise, and the products still maintained ideal rheological properties.RESULTS: The rheological parameters showed that there were no (P > 0.05) differences in yield stress, viscosity and flow behavior index between XG + 10 g kg−1 GG, CF + 5 g kg−1 GG and FF control. LF mayonnaises had lower caloric values and higher dietary fiber content than the FF counterpart. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs illustrated that the network of aggregated droplets in LF treatments contained a large number of interspaced voids of varying dimensions. Furthermore, in a comparison of sensory evaluation of LF treatments with commercial and our FF mayonnaises, there were no (P > 0.05) differences in any sensory scores among XG + 10 g kg−1 GG control.CONCLUSION: This study shows that XG + 10 g kg−1 GG and CF + 5 g kg−1 GG could be used in LF mayonnaise formulations based on its multiple functions on processing properties. Copyright © 2010 Society of Chemical Industry
Dietary Fiber, Quality Control, Citrus, Chemical Phenomena, Viscosity, Polysaccharides, Bacterial, Sensation, Dietary Fats, Galactans, Mannans, Plant Gums, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Humans, Condiments, Particle Size, Rheology, Diet, Fat-Restricted, Nutritive Value
Dietary Fiber, Quality Control, Citrus, Chemical Phenomena, Viscosity, Polysaccharides, Bacterial, Sensation, Dietary Fats, Galactans, Mannans, Plant Gums, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Humans, Condiments, Particle Size, Rheology, Diet, Fat-Restricted, Nutritive Value
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 83 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
