
AbstractBackgroundEggshell strength is crucial for ensuring high‐quality eggs, reducing breakage during handling, and meeting consumer expectations for freshness and integrity. Conventional methods of eggshell strength measurement are often destructive, time‐consuming and unsuitable for large‐scale applications. This study evaluated the potential of near‐infrared (NIR) spectroscopy combined with explainable artificial intelligence (AI) as a rapid, non‐destructive method for determining eggshell strength. Various multivariate analysis techniques were explored to enhance prediction accuracy, including spectral pre‐processing and variable selection methods.ResultsPrincipal component analysis and partial least squares discriminant analysis effectively classified eggs based on a threshold shell strength of 30 N. Regression models, including partial least squares regression, random forest (RF), light gradient boosting machine and K‐nearest neighbors, were evaluated. Using only 14 selected variables, the RF model achieved a very good prediction performance with of 0.83, root mean square error of prediction of 1.49 N and ratio of prediction to deviation of 2.44. The Shapley additive explanation approach provided insights into variable contributions, enhancing the model's interpretability.ConclusionThis study demonstrated that NIR spectroscopy, integrated with explainable AI, is a robust, non‐destructive and environmentally sustainable approach for eggshell strength prediction. This innovative method holds significant potential for optimizing resource utilization and enhancing quality control in the egg industry. © 2025 The Author(s). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Egg Shell, Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared, Artificial Intelligence, Eggs, Animals, Least-Squares Analysis, Chickens, Research Article
Egg Shell, Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared, Artificial Intelligence, Eggs, Animals, Least-Squares Analysis, Chickens, Research Article
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
