
doi: 10.1002/jsfa.12485
pmid: 36740875
AbstractBACKGROUNDl‐Leucine powder (LP) was added to green Robusta coffee beans in order to reduce the difference in flavour between Robusta and Arabica coffee. l‐Leucine was selected as an additive based on the Maillard reaction. The pre‐treatment method conducted in this study was a short soaking (M1) or spraying procedure (M2), then LP was added at varying levels up to 3% (w/w, 30 g kg−1). All samples were roasted (240 °C for 15 min) and extracted using an espresso machine. Volatile compounds were analysed by solid‐phase microextraction‐gas chromatography‐mass selective detection.RESULTSThirty volatile compounds (six pyrroles, eight pyrazines, three phenols, nine furans, two ketones, two aldehydes) were analysed. In 15 coffee samples, the levels of total volatile compounds (based on peak area ratios) ranged from 8.9 (M1‐1) to 15. Non‐treated Robusta had higher levels of bitter aroma compounds than Arabica coffee, and Robusta coffee had lower levels of bitter aroma compounds when pre‐treated with LP. The sum of bitter volatiles (phenols, pyrroles, pyrazines) was lowest in M1‐5 (3% LP), M2‐1 (1% LP; both dried at 50 °C for 15 min) and M2‐7 (3% LP, dried at 70 °C for 15 min) compared with non‐treated Robusta (P < 0.05).CONCLUSIONFrom the results of this study it can be shown that pre‐treatment with LP can improve the flavour of Robusta. © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry.
Leucine, Odorants, Coffea, Powders, Maillard Reaction
Leucine, Odorants, Coffea, Powders, Maillard Reaction
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
