
Abstract Research into global, millennial‐scale climate oscillations during the last glacial requires wiggle matching. One method for adequate wiggle matching is based on the dating of the climate proxy records. Luminescence dating methods are needed for estimates of last glacial ages in terrestrial records. However, such dating methods are not accurate enough for millennial‐scale wiggle matching. It is shown that a multi‐proxy comparison of two sections that are situated close to each other may considerably improve the accuracy of wiggle matching. The method is tested by an application on two loess sections of last glacial age in Vojvodina, Serbia. The climate proxies include magnetic susceptibility, leachate Ba/Sr and grain size. Firstly, single proxy‐wiggle matches between both sections are analysed successively with the same and with different proxies. Secondly, a multi‐proxy wiggle match based on all three proxies of the two sections is presented and compared to the single‐proxy tests. In such a procedure, it becomes clear which wiggles are mainly determined by local conditions and which have a more extended significance. It is concluded that a multi‐proxy approach results in the best and the most unique wiggle matches. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
SDG 13 - Climate Action
SDG 13 - Climate Action
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
