
doi: 10.1002/jps.22287
pmid: 20799363
β-Lactam antimicrobials are known to have a low concentration/therapeutic response. However, extending the period in which β-lactam are free in the plasma does directly influence therapeutic outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of Pluronic® F68 on the antimicrobial activity of ceftazidime when admixed with aminophylline in parenteral solutions by the evaluation of its minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) within 24 h. Ceftazidime, aminophylline, and Pluronics® F68 were evaluated using the MIC method against Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, with these compounds individually and associated in the same parenteral solutions. When Pluronics® F68 was admixtured with ceftazidime alone or with ceftazidime and aminophylline, it was possible to observe lower MIC values not only at 24 h but also at 0 h for both microorganisms. This indicates that Pluronics® F68 may be able to enhance ceftazidime antimicrobial activity in the presence or absence of aminophylline. This fact suggests that Pluronics® F68 can be applied to allow the administration of ceftazidime under continuous infusion in parenteral solutions, beneficiating hospital pharmacotherapy. It may also be possible to reduce ceftazidime doses in formulations achieving the same therapeutic results.
Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Poloxamer, Aminophylline, Ceftazidime, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bronchodilator Agents, Injections, Excipients, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Humans, Drug Interactions, Pseudomonas Infections, Escherichia coli Infections
Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Poloxamer, Aminophylline, Ceftazidime, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bronchodilator Agents, Injections, Excipients, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Humans, Drug Interactions, Pseudomonas Infections, Escherichia coli Infections
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
