
doi: 10.1002/jps.21662
pmid: 19226628
When using the method of deconvolution to establish an IVIVC model, the choice of whether or not to average the data before analysis is a crucial one. Averaging the data leads to a loss of information and current advice on best practise suggests that deconvolution take place at the individual subject level. This study compares each approach and concludes that averaging has a detrimental effect on the accuracy of predictions produced.
Models, Statistical, Chemistry, Pharmaceutical, Models, Biological, Kinetics, Intestinal Absorption, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Solubility, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Computer Simulation, Pharmacokinetics, Algorithms, Software, Forecasting, Tablets
Models, Statistical, Chemistry, Pharmaceutical, Models, Biological, Kinetics, Intestinal Absorption, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Solubility, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Computer Simulation, Pharmacokinetics, Algorithms, Software, Forecasting, Tablets
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
