
doi: 10.1002/jps.20956
pmid: 17497733
The high tablet burden and poor compliance associated with phosphate-binding drugs has led to a search for more potent agents. In vitro-binding studies were performed on the recently introduced binder, lanthanum carbonate (LC; Fosrenol), to compare its phosphate-binding affinity with sevelamer hydrochloride (SH; Renagel). Langmuir equilibrium binding affinities (K(1)) for LC and SH were established using different phosphorus (5-100 mM) and binder (134-670 mg per 50 mL) concentrations at pH 3-7, with or without salts of bile acids present (30 mM). At all pH levels, LC had a higher binding affinity for phosphate than SH. For LC, K(1) was 6.1 +/- 1.0 mM(-1) and was independent of pH. For SH, K(1) was pH dependent, being 1.5 +/- 0.8 mM(-1) at pH 5-7 and 0.025 +/- 0.002 mM(-1) at pH 3, that is, >200 times lower than for LC. In the presence of 30 mM bile salts, SH lost 50% of its phosphate, whereas no displacement of phosphate occurred for LC. These findings indicate that LC binds phosphate more effectively than SH across the pH range encountered in the gastrointestinal tract, and has a lower propensity for bound phosphate to be displaced by competing anions in the intestine.
Anions, Sevelamer, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Binding, Competitive, Phosphates, Bile Acids and Salts, Kinetics, Drug Stability, Models, Chemical, Lanthanum, Polyamines, Chelating Agents
Anions, Sevelamer, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Binding, Competitive, Phosphates, Bile Acids and Salts, Kinetics, Drug Stability, Models, Chemical, Lanthanum, Polyamines, Chelating Agents
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 68 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
