Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of Pharmacy ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Crossref
UQ eSpace
Article . 2025
Data sources: UQ eSpace
UQ eSpace
Article . 2025
Data sources: UQ eSpace
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Impact of Home Medicines Review on medication regimen complexity

Authors: Shrey Seth; Lipin Lukose; Wubshet H. Tesfaye; Sathvik B. Sridhar; Girish Thunga; Ronald L. Castelino;

Impact of Home Medicines Review on medication regimen complexity

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPrevious studies on pharmacist‐led Home Medicines Review (HMR) have demonstrated positive associations of HMR and clinical outcomes. However, little is known about their impact on medication regimen complexity.AimInvestigate the impact of pharmacist‐led HMRs on simplifying medication regimen complexity using the Medication Regimen Complexity Index (MRCI).MethodA retrospective cohort study of 196 general practitioners (GPs) initiated HMRs, conducted over a period of 2 years (2020–2022) using two credentialed pharmacists in New South Wales, Australia. MRCI was used to measure the complexity at two separate time points, at baseline and following pharmacists' recommendations (assuming the GPs accepted all of the pharmacists' recommendations provided during the HMRs). The Wilcoxon signed‐rank test was used to determine the difference between the scores at baseline and after HMR. Ethical approval was granted by the University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference no: 2022/584) and the study conforms to the Australian National statement on the ethical conduct in human research.ResultsDuring the HMR service, pharmacists made a total of 792 recommendations (mean ± standard deviation [4.04 ± 2.3] per HMR), among which dosage and frequency adjustment, laboratory monitoring, and therapeutic monitoring were the most common, collectively accounting for almost half of the recommendations. The median MRCI score at baseline was 28.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 21.5–37.6) and following pharmacists' recommendations was 29 (IQR 21.9–37.1). The difference between the baseline and post‐HMR scores was not statistically significant.ConclusionOur study demonstrates the lack of significant reductions in medication complexity following HMRs as measured by the MRCI. However, these results need to be interpreted with caution as not all interactions with patients lead to a change in the MRCI score. Comprehensive examination of individual medication changes may provide more meaningful and clinically relevant inferences.

Keywords

Medication Regimen Complexity Index, Pharmacy services, Home medicines reviews, 2736 Pharmacology (medical), Complex medication regimens, 3611 Pharmacy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Top 10%
Average
Average
hybrid