
doi: 10.1002/jpen.1469
pmid: 30508254
AbstractBackgroundAlthough feeding intolerance is a common complication in trauma patients, the incidence, development, and effects are poorly understood.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study in which trauma patients were classified as having feeding intolerance based on time to reach feeding goal. Subsequently, we sorted patients by gastric residual volumes (GRVs) or symptoms of slowed gastrointestinal motility.ResultsOne‐third of trauma patients experienced delayed time to reach feeding goal after diet initiation. Delayed feeding was associated with prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stays, increased readmission rates, and increased incidence of sepsis. Patients with elevated GRV (>500 mL) had significantly prolonged ICU and hospital stays and increase incidence of sepsis. Patients with >2 symptoms of slowed gastrointestinal motility had prolonged ICU and hospital stays, delayed time to reach feeding goals, significantly increased readmission rates, increased incidence of infectious and thromboembolic complications and sepsis, decreased serum prealbumin levels, and increased CRP levels.ConclusionDecreased gastrointestinal motility in trauma patients is associated with worse outcomes and increased systemic inflammation.
Adult, Inflammation, Male, Parenteral Nutrition, Critical Illness, Incidence, Stomach, Hospitalization, Intensive Care Units, C-Reactive Protein, Enteral Nutrition, Gastric Emptying, Sepsis, Thromboembolism, Humans, Prealbumin, Female, Gastrointestinal Motility, Intubation, Gastrointestinal, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Inflammation, Male, Parenteral Nutrition, Critical Illness, Incidence, Stomach, Hospitalization, Intensive Care Units, C-Reactive Protein, Enteral Nutrition, Gastric Emptying, Sepsis, Thromboembolism, Humans, Prealbumin, Female, Gastrointestinal Motility, Intubation, Gastrointestinal, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
