Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of Orthopaed...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Tibial cartilage, subchondral bone plate and trabecular bone microarchitecture in varus‐ and valgus‐osteoarthritis versus controls

Authors: Sophie Rapagna; Bryant C. Roberts; Lucian B. Solomon; Karen J. Reynolds; Dominic Thewlis; Egon Perilli;

Tibial cartilage, subchondral bone plate and trabecular bone microarchitecture in varus‐ and valgus‐osteoarthritis versus controls

Abstract

AbstractThis preliminary study quantified tibia cartilage thickness (Cart.Th), subchondral bone plate thickness (SBPl.Th) and subchondral trabecular bone (STB) microarchitecture in subjects with varus‐ or valgus‐ malaligned knees diagnosed with end‐stage knee osteoarthritis (OA) and compared them to controls (non‐OA). Tibial plateaus from 25 subjects with knee‐OA (undergoing knee arthroplasty) and 15 cadavers (controls) were micro‐CT scanned (17 µm/voxel). Joint alignment was classified radiographically for OA subjects (varus‐aligned n = 18, valgus‐aligned n = 7). Cart.Th, SBPl.Th, STB bone volume fraction (BV/TV) and their medial‐to‐lateral ratios were analyzed in anteromedial, anterolateral, posteromedial and posterolateral subregions. Varus‐OA and valgus‐OA were compared to controls. Compared to controls (1.19–1.54 mm), Cart.Th in varus‐OA was significantly lower anteromedially (0.58 mm, −59%) and higher laterally (2.19–2.47 mm, +60–63%); in valgus‐OA, Cart.Th was significantly higher posteromedially (1.86 mm, +56%). Control medial‐to‐lateral Cart.Th ratios were around unity (0.8–1.1), in varus‐OA significantly below (0.2–0.6) and in valgus‐OA slightly above (1.0–1.3) controls. SBPl.Th and BV/TV were significantly higher medially in varus‐OA (0.58‐0.72 mm and 37–44%, respectively) and laterally in valgus‐OA (0.60–0.61 mm and 32–37%), compared to controls (0.26–0.47 mm and 18–37%). In varus‐OA, the medial‐to‐lateral SBPl.Th and BV/TV ratios were above unity (1.4–2.4) and controls (0.8–2.1); in valgus‐OA they were closer to unity (0.8‐1.1) and below controls. Varus‐ and valgus‐OA tibia differ significantly from controls in Cart.Th, SBPl.Th and STB microarchitecture depending on joint alignment, suggesting structural changes in OA may reflect differences in medial‐to‐lateral load distribution upon the tibial plateau. Here we identified an inverse relationship between cartilage thickness and underlying subchondral bone, suggesting a whole‐joint response in OA to daily stimuli.

Country
Australia
Keywords

Cartilage, Articular, Knee Joint, Tibia, Bone microarchitecture, micro‐CT, 150, 610, Osteoarthritis, Knee, knee osteoarthritis, tibial plateau, Cartilage, Cancellous Bone, Humans, cartilage, Bone Plates

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    22
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
22
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
bronze