
pmid: 8164097
AbstractIt is generally recognized that the mechanical properties of soft connective tissues are affected by their structural components. We documented collagen density distributions in human knee ligaments to quantify differences in density within and between these ligaments. In order to explain the variations in mechanical properties within and between different knee ligaments as described in the literature, the distributions of collagen density were correlated with these biomechanical findings. Human knee ligaments were shown to be nonhomogeneous structures with regard to collagen density. The anterior bundles of all ligaments contained significantly more collagen mass per unit of volume than the posterior bundles did. The percentage differences between the anterior and posterior bundles, in relation to the posterior bundles, were about 25% for the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and the collateral ligaments and about 10% for the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). Along the cruciate ligaments, the central segments had higher collagen densities than did segments adjacent to the ligament insertions (ACL 9%, PCL 24%). The collagen density in the ACL was significantly lower than that in the other ligaments. These variations within and between the ligaments correlate well with the variations in mechanical properties described in the literature; however, other structural differences have to be taken into account to fully explain the variations in mechanical properties from the structural components.
Aged, 80 and over, Knee Joint, Middle Aged, Hydroxyproline, Ligaments, Articular, Humans, Posterior Cruciate Ligament, Collagen, Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Aged
Aged, 80 and over, Knee Joint, Middle Aged, Hydroxyproline, Ligaments, Articular, Humans, Posterior Cruciate Ligament, Collagen, Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 33 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
