
doi: 10.1002/joe.21612
Implementing change in organizations where interests conflict and powerful groups of stakeholders influence decisions is a risky proposition. Involving stakeholders in all aspects of planning, implementing, and embedding the change can significantly help overcome resistance but is not enough. Leaders of a project to establish an electronic case file system at the United Kingdom's Financial Ombudsman Service learned that stakeholder misgivings can continue to surface postimplementation. Their experiences highlight the need to make the required investments in time and other resources; broadly communicate intentions, policies, and program steps; pay particular attention to the key stakeholder groups that have the most influence on buy‐in; listen to employees’ concerns; and take concrete steps to swiftly address employees fears and complaints—before, during, and after implementation. The key to success, they found, is to contain resistance long enough for stakeholders to become accustomed to and grow to appreciate the change. ©2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
