
doi: 10.1002/jmv.27035
pmid: 33942328
AbstractCongenital cytomegalovirus infection (cCMVi) is an important cause of sensorineural hearing loss in newborns. Detection of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) DNA in urine has been used to screen for cCMVi in newborns. However, the matrix effect of urine on HCMV DNA detection is unclear. To evaluate the matrix effect of urine on HCMV DNA detection and optimize the sample process strategy to eliminate or minimize the impact of urine on HCMV DNA detection, DNA in spiked samples was extracted using different DNA extraction methods, and urine samples that could inhibit HCMV DNA detection were mixed to evaluate the inhibitory substances, inhibitory mechanism, and elimination of the inhibitory effect. The optimal urine sample process strategy was evaluated using 42 adult female urine samples and 42 newborn urine samples spiked with HCMV. Some urine samples were found to inhibit HCMV DNA detection due to DNA degradation. The addition of ≥5 mM EDTA to the urine before extraction eliminated the inhibitory effect of urine and did not affect the detection results of urine exhibiting no inhibition. Of the 42 adult female and 42 newborn urine samples, four and two samples, respectively, could inhibit HCMV DNA detection. However, the inhibitory effects of these six urine samples were eliminated after the addition of EDTA. The collective results indicate that the addition of EDTA can completely eliminate the impact of inhibitors present in urine on HCMV DNA extraction and improve the detection of HCMV in urine.
Adult, Infant, Newborn, Cytomegalovirus, Urine, Cytomegalovirus Infections, DNA, Viral, Humans, Female, Edetic Acid
Adult, Infant, Newborn, Cytomegalovirus, Urine, Cytomegalovirus Infections, DNA, Viral, Humans, Female, Edetic Acid
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
